Application · Attosecond / Strong-Field Physics

Attosecond & High-Harmonic Generation

Drive lasers, gas-jet / waveguide HHG sources, XUV beamlines, and attosecond pump-probe diagnostics for strong-field physics, electron dynamics, and ARPES.

Pushing toward sub-30 fs CEP-stable pulses, HHG cutoff energies, or single-attosecond isolation? WaveQuanta scopes drive lasers, post-compression, dispersion management, and XUV detection for your beamline.

Step 2 — Confirm the problem

Common project challenges

If any of these sound familiar, you're in the right place. WaveQuanta engineers have seen — and solved — every one of them.

1

CEP stability over a multi-day measurement

Slow drift kills RABBITT and streaking. Active CEP feedback + thermal control are non-negotiable.

2

Achieving the right drive pulse: short, intense, CEP-stable

Sub-30 fs at >1 mJ + CEP-locked is the typical entry point. Hollow-fiber or MPC compression after a CPA chain.

3

HHG flux vs cutoff trade-off

Higher driving intensity = more cutoff but worse phase matching. Long gas cells, waveguides, and pressure profiles all matter.

4

XUV spectrometer & detector choice

Soft X-ray CCDs (back-illuminated, vacuum-compatible) vs MCP + phosphor + camera. Photon counting vs analog readout.

5

Vacuum system + differential pumping

HHG beamline pressure goes from 100 mbar (gas) → 10⁻⁹ mbar (XUV optics). Differential pumping stages required.

6

Dispersion management of the drive laser

Each glass / mirror in the path adds GDD. Below 30 fs, you must compensate every element.

7

Precise pump-probe delay (atto-stable)

Sub-100-as delay stability requires interferometric stabilization + low-vibration mounts.

8

Reference / ionization signal calibration

Cross-correlating XUV with IR pump for time-zero. Often built around a TOF spectrometer.

Step 3 — Understand the system

Typical system architecture

Most projects in this area follow a similar signal flow. Your specific architecture depends on resolution, throughput, and form-factor targets.

CEP-LOCKED DRIVE LASER

fs CPA chain delivering CEP-stabilized, mJ-level pulses at 1 kHz typical.

HOLLOW-FIBER POST-COMPRESSION

Spectral broadening + chirped-mirror compression to sub-10 fs.

HHG DRIVE OPTICS & FOCUS

Long focal length focusing into gas cell or waveguide, polarization control.

VACUUM BEAMLINE & DIFFERENTIAL PUMPING

Differential pumping stages from gas target to XUV optics.

CEP DIAGNOSTICS & TIMING

f-2f interferometer + CEP feedback; pump-probe delay line at attosecond stability.

Step 4 — Pick the modules

Recommended system modules

These are the building blocks. Each module is a category of products — pick the right brand and grade for your project stage below.

Step 5 — Match your project stage

Choose your project stage

Same modules, three configurations sized for where your project is today. Move up the tiers as you progress from research to validation to OEM.

Research Starter

First HHG / atto group · proof-of-principle

Entry-level HHG beamline for university labs. Gas-jet HHG, simple grating spectrometer, XUV CCD. No CEP-lock yet — for cutoff studies and phase-matching work.

  • Yb / Ti:sapph drive · 1 kHz · ~1 mJ
  • Gas-jet HHG cell
  • Flat-field grating + soft X-ray CCD
  • Pulse diagnostic (FROG / Wizzler)
  • Low-dispersion drive optics
  • Vacuum chamber + pumps

BOM tier: $300k – $700k

OEM Production

User-facility beamline / industrial atto source

Turn-key attosecond beamline for a national user facility or industrial XUV source customer. Sealed industrial drive + service contract + remote control.

  • Sealed industrial fs CPA + CEP-lock
  • Fully integrated HHG beamline
  • User-facility control software
  • Long-term supply + service
  • Documented uptime KPIs
  • Vacuum & safety certified

BOM tier: $3M+ · contract

Step 9 — Common questions

Frequently asked questions

Quick answers to the questions our application engineers hear most often.

How short / intense does the drive laser need to be for HHG?

Practical HHG with reasonable cutoff (50–100 eV) requires ≤30 fs at > 10¹⁴ W/cm² focal intensity. For isolated attosecond pulses you typically need sub-10 fs CEP-stabilized. Most groups reach this via hollow-fiber post-compression of a CPA system.

Gas-jet vs hollow-waveguide HHG?

Gas jet is simpler and widely used for proof-of-principle and cutoff studies. Hollow waveguides achieve quasi-phase-matching over longer interaction lengths, giving higher flux and cutoff but require careful pressure / mode tuning.

CEP-stable or not?

For RABBITT / harmonic combs / time-resolved ARPES, CEP-stability is optional — you only need few-cycle and good timing. For isolated attosecond pulses + streaking, CEP-locked drive is mandatory.

Which XUV detector should I pick?

Back-illuminated soft X-ray CCDs (Princeton PIXIS-XO / PI-MTE3 / SOPHIA-XO) give photon counting in the 50–1500 eV range. Lower energies use grating + MCP + phosphor + camera. Pick photon-counting CCD if you need single-shot quantitative spectra.

How much vacuum do I really need?

Gas target: 10–100 mbar. After differential pumping (single aperture): 10⁻⁵ mbar. XUV optics + detector: 10⁻⁷ to 10⁻⁹ mbar (to keep MgF₂ / Al filters and CCD clean). Plan for 2–3 differential pumping stages.

Can I add HHG to my existing fs lab?

If you have ≥1 mJ at ≤30 fs you can add a basic gas-jet HHG arm + XUV grating + CCD as a vacuum extension. Budget around $400–700k for the upgrade. Going to attosecond pump-probe roughly doubles the budget for hollow-fiber + CEP-lock + streaking station.

Sub-100 attosecond timing — is it real?

Yes, with attosecond-stabilized delay lines (piezo + interferometric feedback over a CW reference beam) and vibration-isolated mounts. Long acquisition (hours to days) is the practical limit due to slow drift, not the delay line.

Long-term supply for a national user facility?

Yi-Laser CPA + WaveQuanta optics + Princeton soft X-ray cameras support 5–10 year supply contracts with batch reproducibility. We've delivered to multiple national labs and synchrotrons; we provide documented uptime + service-level agreements at OEM tier.

Step 10 — Engineering Review

Application Engineering Review

Tell us your application, current setup, and project context. A WaveQuanta application engineer will return initial recommendations within 1 business day.

  1. 1 Application
  2. 2 Current setup
  3. 3 Project & purchase

Tell us your application

What you want to measure, in plain words. We'll translate to optics.

Your current setup

What do you already have? Skip any field that doesn't apply.

Project & purchase context

Helps us decide whether to scope a starter kit, a full engineering review, or an OEM design-in.